Comparison
Make vs Zapier
Make and Zapier both connect apps and automate workflows, and both are no-code. The difference shows up in complexity -- Make's visual builder suits workflows with more branching and data transformation, while Zapier favors speed and simplicity. Here is how they compare.
Make (formerly Integromat)
Make
- Visual, node-based workflow builder makes complex branching easier to see at a glance
- Handles more complex data transformations natively than a simpler linear builder
- Often more cost-effective at moderate-to-high operation volume
- Good middle ground between Zapier's simplicity and a fully self-hosted tool
The visual builder has more moving parts than Zapier's simpler step-by-step format, so it takes a bit longer to learn.
Zapier
Zapier
- Very large library of pre-built app integrations
- No-code interface designed for non-technical users to set up quickly
- Templates for common workflows reduce setup time
- Widely used, so troubleshooting help and examples are easy to find
Pricing scales with the number of tasks run per month, which can add up for high-volume or highly complex automations.
Which one fits which task
Setting up a simple automation quickly without technical help
Zapier
No-code interface and templates get a basic automation running fast.
Building a workflow with multiple branches or data transformations
Make
The visual builder makes complex branching logic easier to design and follow.
Running a moderate-to-high volume of automations on a budget
Make
Often more cost-effective than Zapier's per-task pricing at similar volume.
Connecting common business apps with the widest integration coverage
Zapier
Larger integration library covers more niche apps out of the box.
Not sure which fits your situation? Try the AI Workflow Builder, a free tool that maps out a step-by-step workflow for common business tasks.